James,+Andy

====The food ration- This shows the allegory of Soviet Union’s upper class men and lower class men. The people from the lower classes have decrease in food, but the upper class people wasn’t affected with starvation.====

**8. Abuse of Power (How do some abuse power at the expense of others?)**
====Kitchen- Animals are forbidden to use oils to save them, yet the pigs used the kitchen to cook their own food (because the kitchen smell follows right after the the event on prohibition on using lanterns, it can be inferred that George Orwell tried to tell the pigs used oils to cook food)==== ====Spontaneous Demonstration- This day is when the animals celebrate the struggles and triumphs of Animal Farm. During this day, the animals follow specific military formation. Pigs get to lead the formation.====

Andy
1. A perfervid panjandrum of Animalism, Boxer the horse, deduces that his perpetual perambulations, whilst inauspicious, invidious, and laborious withal, will only be aggravated by his caducity and it’s concomitant infirmities, inequities, and infelicities. In a portentous peripeteia, his hoof is irrevocably sundered, rendering him despondent and impuissant, i.e. an imposition to Snowball’s pecuniary peregrinations. Thereafter, Boxer was consigned to a minacious vehicle with “Horse Slaughterer” transcribed onto it. Squealer endeavors to propitiate the dolorous denizens, the more erudite of whom had already disseminated said tidings, with the asseveration that the aforementioned locomotive legerdemain was merely a palimpsest of a “Horse Slaughterer” utilized by contemporary veterinarians. Napoleon, in his eulogy, pontificates upon how to emulate Boxer via adhering to his own tenets.

3. a) The contumelious contrivances of Squealer and Napoleon hearken back to Stalin’s own predilection towards the calumniation of all those who impugned him, derogating and denigrating their intellects. It is demagogy, as the inculpation of others is not one’s own exculpation. b)The evanescence of the diurnal desideratum that is the quintessential comestible brazenly betokens the aggravation and ossification of quotidian life. c)Boxer’s adversity was but a fustian felicity encapsulating the repudiation of remuneration evinced by the Soviet Union and, conceivably, is an intimation towards the Gulags and the Trials, as even the most conscientious, assiduous, and pertinacious of personage within Russia had been maltreated and marginalized.

4. a) The “Spontaneous Demonstration”, is excogitated and instigated. (Irony) b) The adjuration of the proletariat to emulate Boxer in anticipation of amelioration is irrational and inequitable, as it can only exacerbate their travails and tribulations. (Irony)

6. In concordance with anterior asseverations, it is axiomatic that no single burgher has the capacity to coruscate, facilitate, or even mitigate in regards to their lucubrations, so it is unfeasible and untenable to anticipate the proverbial “better future” by “working harder”.

9. a) What can be extrapolated from Boxer’s complacent comportment towards the debilitating labor inextricably integrated into Animalism? b) How had it been so abecedarian to cozen the animals into rationalizing that their contemporaneous quandaries are any more propitious or auspicious than with Jones? c) How was Boxer, immutably and inexorably, an expedient political panacea? d) How would the self-panegyrized “Spontaneous Demonstration” only further explicate the Machiavellian mentality of Napoleon. e) Why don’t the more erudite animals, videlicet the literate ones, endeavor to mitigate or palliate their predicament? 1. Is Napoleon the most sagacious or perspicacious entity domiciled within the farm?